Is this something about time on the inside passing slower than on the outside? I wonder whether the absorption of more matter (temporarily) stops the effect that finally may lead to a firewall or not. Sorry for bothering you with this again, but I’m starting to wonder how an infalling observer can ever enter a black hole even from his own perspective. I repeate “the generalizations as described by Prof Strassler help a great deal to us laypeople”. So excuse me for raising it again.Changing sign of CC (Lambda) in ADS may be a big change. One view is that changes are obviously still occurring, 4.9% atoms, but maybe these atoms are depleting and converted back “down” into dark matter and inturn down to dark energy hence stretching the galaxies apart which will cause the shell to expand because the local pull of matter on the surfaces is reduced. This gives me the cue to deal with how there are black holes, which seems to be part of your initial question. Observations about all causal horizons depend on the observer’s acceleration. Where the coordinate speed of light is zero, which is why the light doesn’t get out? If an observer outside the hole sees the infalling guy (and his clock) move slower until he stops completely and never passes the event horizon; isn’t whatever the infaller experiences inside the hole happening sometime beyond the infinite future when the outside universe has seen the hole evaporate an infinity ago? So, the information of everything falling in is preserved by the outgoing radiation, returning it to the Universe and resolving the paradox. Could you explain? Now, the black hole recap. The ‘no hair’ theorem states if two black holes have the same mass, electromagnetic charge and angular momentum (the momentum of its spin), then their behaviour would be completely identical. Of course, one can also go back to Hawking’s papers in which he proposes the S matrix should become a dollar sign. The “information of the particle swallowed” comes from the state of the various fields, including the gravitational field, when the pair itself was created. 5: Maybe the information is stored in the Hawking radiation? But I have not followed his work on the role of chaos in general relativity. I think there would be broad agreement that there is no limit to the number of parameters (“stable hair”) that can be had by a stable black hole in AdS space, but that is not quite the same thing. As long as fusion keeps happening, the star burns bright & hot as a by product of fusion & exists happily. This is strictly not cricket, and puzzled astronomers. It was conserved because the energy of the absorbed particle was negative. It does not convince. - Share In, http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2015/PP-43-06.PDF, Is there anti-Information? Remember Hawking was about 30 when he showed black holes radiate. When I see the plot, inverted 3D mass/area, I immediately think of a possible analogy, correct me if I am wrong, of ocean waves. Which of these laws is lying? Otherwise the radiative photons will slow down. In the future is it possible to address stimulated emission proposed by Prof. Chris Adami, from Michigan State University, having to do with the Information paradox. The concept is utter nonsense. Oh! But we don’t know if such solutions would be stable from quantum theory’s perspective, and of course we don’t know what the rules of quantum gravity will actually say. I’d like to know what’s new about it? Probably asking more questions than we have equations to explain with dark matter… But I do wonder about the relationship between regular matter and dark matter. Could the consensus be wrong? Astrophysicists need not be concerned that there will be changes to what they think they know about stellar or galactic “black” holes. First, let’s talk information. That particle goes off to infinity, far from the black hole: its energy is obviously positive. Attempts to resolve these incompatible physical requirements have been unsuccessful to date; theorists who have worked on the problem call the dilemma the black hole information paradox. And these fluctuations are simply those of quantum fields in empty space, containing (apparently) no information at all. The information about the two still-collapsing shells is locked behind the horizon forever. Fig. “No particle can exit from the event horizon, no particles could come out of the black hole”.